Newsroom 7-25-2008

Daily News Summary - July 22,2008

Daily News Summary – July 22, 2008

Dr. Richard Evans, big time scientist that has been behind the global warming scam has completely reversed his position. Click here for more http://www.prisonplanet.com/top-rocket-scientist-no-evidence-co2-causes-global-warming.html

Americans finally wake up to the fact that the economy is in serious trouble. Click fore more http://www.prisonplanet.com/the-week-that-america-woke-up-to-the-economic-crisis.html

An official guest list for Bohemian Grove’s 2008 midsummer encampment along with a map of the Grove’s facilities has been obtained by a San Francisco based action group who held protests and information drives outside the entrance to the elite summer retreat. For the full story, go to http://www.infowars.net/articles/july2008/210708Grove.htm

The United States is set to lead a joint military exercise in the Atlantic Ocean to show off its combat capability as a warning to Iran. Click for full story George Washington’s Blog

Ben S. Bernanke and Henry Paulson are under pressure to embrace the big-government policies of America in the 1930s, or Sweden in the 1990s, to contain the conflagration engulfing the U.S. housing and financial markets. Cick for more Bloomberg.

DARPA, the Pentagon boffinry outfit which bestrides the tech world like some mighty, erratic robot colossus with a frikkin laser beam on its head, has made a new move. The plan is to electronically tag US combat soldiers in a similar fashion to criminals under judicial restraint. Full article here.

Many people deny that the U.S. government presides over a global empire. If you speak of U.S. imperialism, they will fancy that you must be a decrepit Marxist-Leninist who has recently awakened after spending decades in a coma.Click fere for full story Lew Rockwell.com .

Fox News hides truth about cancer-causing additives in milk from Monsanto. Click for video Youtube.

Attorney General Michael Mukasey prompted Congress Monday morning, during a speech to the conservative American Enterprise Institute, to create new rules governing the rights of detainees held at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. The American Civil Liberties Union immediately responded to Mukasey’s request, calling his proposals nothing short of asking Congress to subvert the Constitution. Raw Story click for full story.

American physicists warned not to debate global warming. Click The Register for full story.
Peanuts Kill More Americans Than Terrorists. Click for more http://prisonplanet.com/articles/january2007/050107peanutskill.htm.

CNN seems to be obsessed with blaming everything on ET. Every time we see Larry King, he’s talking about aliens and UFO’s. YouTube click for video. They are real journalists.
The Global Elite have dumbed Americans down. Click here for video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9KaZvQ5LavA

McCain blames Obama for higher gas prices. Read article.

The Bush administration threatens war with Iran as if the decision is the president’s to make. The president believes himself to be constrained by neither the Constitution nor the 1973 War Powers Resolution.

Travelers, be aware: Your full-blown image — private parts and all — could soon be visible to a security officer, on-screen, at an airport near you. http://www.infowars.com/?p=3507

Governor Wants Chicago Martial Law

Governor Proposes Martial Law Choppers For Chicago
Paul Joseph Watson

Prison Planet

Monday, July 21, 2008

The gun control capital of America - Chicago - where only the criminals are allowed to own firearms - has been hit by a fresh wave of crime and violence, prompting Governor Rod Blagojevich to call for National Guard helicopters to be used in law enforcement operations.
The precedent for National Guard units and military personnel to be used in domestic law enforcement has been a growing cancer for the last three decades.

Blagojevich plans to form an “elite tactical team” to help the city fight crime, according to a speech he gave last week.
“Violent crime in the city of Chicago is out of control,” Blagojevich said at the bill signing ceremony. “I’m offering resources of the state to the city to work in a constructive way with Mayor Daley to do everything we can possibly do to help stop this violence,” said the governor.
Citing the fact that a child has been shot nearly every day since the end of June, Blagojevich called for National Guard helicopters to be used in high crime areas.
However, as police department spokeswoman Monique Bond noted, the actual number of homicides in the city is significantly down.

“2008 may end with fewer than 500 homicides and that it is expected to be one of the least deadly years in the city in the last 40 years,” reports NBC5.com.
Following questions regarding the use of National Guard choppers in the city, Blagojevich’s office attempted to pour cold water over the issue by stating that National Guard troops would not enter the city.

“The only way the National Guard would be involved, if they are involved, is with the use of tactical helicopters that are currently used in narcotics operations,” spokesman Lucio Guerrero said in a prepared statement.

The precedent for National Guard units and military personnel to be used in domestic law enforcement has been a growing cancer for the last three decades.
Documentarian and radio talk show host Alex Jones has has attended numerous military urban warfare training drills across the U.S. where role players were used to simulate arresting American citizens, confiscating their weapons, and taking them to internment camps. Actors scream out that they have constitutional rights as they are handcuffed and hauled off to the detainment facility.

Legislation has already been passed that paves the way for the U.S. military to engage American citizens on home soil.
The John Warner Defense Authorization Act of 2007 allows the President to declare a “public emergency” and station troops anywhere in America and take control of state-based National Guard units without the consent of the governor or local authorities, in order to “suppress public disorder.”

Military-style drills involving unmarked black helicopters (the kind that the corporate media insists only exist inside the minds of conspiracy nutjobs) took place in Denver and Florida last month under the pretext of “terrorism training,” with choppers buzzing around downtown Denver and even causing damage to people’s property by flying well below legal altitudes.

Bohemian Grove Official Guest List

Steve Watson
Infowars.net
Monday, July 21, 2008

An official guest list for Bohemian Grove’s 2008 midsummer encampment along with a map of the Grove’s facilities has been obtained by a San Francisco based action group who held protests and information drives outside the entrance to the elite summer retreat.

The list reveals that amongst the hundreds of corporate representatives, government officials and banking elites, guests also included former president George H.W. Bush, David Rockefeller, Henry Kissinger, Donald Rumsfeld, Colin Powell, as well as several former directors of the CIA, including James Woolsey.
For the full story, go to http://www.infowars.net/articles/july2008/210708Grove.htm

Bush, McCain & Obama To Visit Bohemian Grove?
Email page

Paul Joseph Watson

Prison Planet

Friday, July 11, 2008

Outgoing President George W. Bush and both of his presumptive replacements John McCain and Barack Obama are rumored to be in attendance at this year’s Bohemian Grove gathering, an annual get-together of the global elite staged inside a sprawling forest encampment which kicks off tonight and runs until July 27.

Bohemian Grove is a 136-year-old all-male encampment complete with restaurants, bars, stages and lodges, which caters to around 2,000 members of the global elite along with Californian hoi polloi on a yearly basis in July. The camp is set within a 2,700 acre secluded forest replete with giant redwood trees.

Former attendees include Ronald Reagan and Richard Nixon, who both went on to become President, as well as regulars like Henry Kissinger, Alan Greenspan, David Rockefeller, Colin Powell, as well as George W. Bush and his father.

In 2000 radio host and film maker Alex Jones infiltrated the gathering and caught exclusive video footage of a bizarre mock human sacrifice ritual, known as “the cremation of care”, under a 40 foot stone owl that the members refer to as Molech.

Attendees dress up like Klan members in hooded robes and perform druidic pagan ceremonies to mark the spectacular finale of the event.

In 2004, The New York Post reported that top gay porn star Chad Savage was hired by the Grove to “service” its members during the event and “attend to their every need”.
“When they’re not listening to policy speeches, “Bohos” are known to urinate freely in the redwoods and perform mock-druidic rituals that revolve around a 40-foot-tall stone owl. In one ritual, called “Cremation of Care,” members wearing red-hooded robes cremate a coffin effigy of “Dull Care” at the base of the owl altar,” the report stated.

Alex Jones discusses the shocking footage he obtained during his 2000 infiltration of the Grove.
Homosexual orgies are known to be part of the festivities enjoyed by the predominately “Christian conservative” leaders who go there. Former attendee Richard Nixon once referred to the Grove as, “the most faggy goddamned thing you could ever imagine.”

A reader who got a summer job working at the Grove in 2005, Chris Jones, told us that he was regularly propositioned for sex by the old men attending the encampment and asked if he “slept around” and wanted to have some fun.

Jones was later sentenced to three years in jail by California authorities for simply showing a tape of his visit to minors.

However, the media’s attitude to hundreds of powerbrokers attending an event at which the Manhattan Project was known to have been born, while frolicking around dressed up as women pissing up trees and having gay sex, has been sophomoric to say the least.

One such hit piece in the Sacramento News & Review, which ties the Grove as well as public organizations such as the Bilderberg Group and the Trilateral Commission with shape-shifting reptoid conspiracies, is useful for only one piece of information - the claim that Presidential hopeful John McCain may be attending this year’s gathering.

In addition, according to an Arizona Daily Star report about a different subject, President Bush’s schedule for next week has not been released, meaning Bush, a regular attendee with his father to Bohemian Grove in past years, could be set to make a visit at some point to mark the last year of his presidency.

Tellingly, both McCain and Democratic candidate Barack Obama will be in California from Saturday to Tuesday, during which time both candidates are scheduled to speak at the National Council of La Raza, a racist Mexican separatist group that advocates a violent overthrow of the southwestern U.S. states.

Their schedule puts them in the perfect location to enjoy a night at the Grove this weekend.
Two years ago we were able to accurately surmise then British Prime Minister Tony Blair’s visit to the Grove, which coincided with a visit to San Francisco where he met with powerbrokers.
Thus far, there has only been one other mainstream report concerning the event, an article entitled Power brokers due at Bohemian Grove, appearing in the Santa Rosa Press Democrat, a local paper that routinely covers the gathering.

“Critics, who until recent years mounted protests outside its gates, say the gatherings serve as strategy sessions for a New World Order operating outside democratic institutions,” states the article.

“Most critics raise the specter of national policy with global implications coming from behind the gates of an exclusive, closed-door gathering of largely conservative, wealthy white men.”

Something Big about To Happen Warns Ron Paul

Wally Says Check This Out

The message was sent in reference to "Ron Paul: "Some Big Events Are About To Occur"":
Texas Congressman Ron Paul has warned the House that he is "convinced the time is now upon us that some Big Events are about to occur." that will cause liberty to go "into deep hibernation".
http://www.prisonplanet.com/ron-paul-some-big-events-are-about-to-occur.html

Obama Wants His Own Hitler Youth

Obama Calls For National Civilian Stasi


Presidential candidate wants domestic “security force” as powerful as U.S. military, columnist compares proposal to Hitler Youth
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Thursday, July 17, 2008

Presidential frontrunner Barack Obama has called for a “civilian national security force” as powerful as the U.S. military, comments that were ignored by the vast majority of the corporate media but compared by one journalist to the Nazi Hitler Youth.

“We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded,” Obama told a Colorado Springs audience earlier this month.

World Net Daily editor Joseph Farah asked if he was the only journalist in America who found Obama’s statement troubling.


“If we’re going to create some kind of national police force as big, powerful and well-funded as our combined U.S. military forces, isn’t this rather a big deal?” wrote Farah.

“Are we talking about creating a police state here? The U.S. Army alone has nearly 500,000 troops. That doesn’t count reserves or National Guard. In 2007, the U.S. Defense budget was $439 billion. Is Obama serious about creating some kind of domestic security force bigger and more expensive than that? If not, why did he say it? What did he mean?”

KnoxNews.com is seemingly the only other media outlet to express interest in exactly what Obama is proposing.

“The statement was made in the context of youth service. Is this an organization for just the youth or are adults going to participate? How does one get away from the specter of other such “youth” organizations from Nazi Germany and the former Soviet Union when talking about it?” wrote Michael Silence.

Obama’s proposal smacks of an expanded version of an existing program in which hundreds of police, firefighters, paramedics and utility workers have been trained and recently dispatched as “Terrorism Liaison Officers” in Colorado, Arizona and California to watch for “suspicious activity” which is later fed into a secret government database.

It is also reminiscent of the supposedly canned 2002 Operation TIPS program, which would have turned 4 per cent of Americans into informants under the jurisdiction of the Justice Department.

TIPS lived on in other guises, such as the Highway Watch program, a $19 billion dollar Homeland Security-run project which trains truckers to watch for suspicious activity on America’s highways.

More recently, ABC News reported that “The FBI is taking cues from the CIA to recruit thousands of covert informants in the United States as part of a sprawling effort…..to aid with criminal investigations.”

Since authorities now define mundane activities like buying baby formula, beer, wearing Levi jeans, carrying identifying documents like a drivers license and traveling with women or children or mentioning the U.S. constitution as the behavior of potential terrorists, the bounty for the American Stasi to turn in political dissidents is sure to be too tempting to resist under Obama’s new program

House Divided Cannot Stand
By Wally Paul
http://Infobattles.blogspot.com
July 17, 2008

A house divided cannot stand. America today is very fractured. This is a condition that the New World order loves to precipitate. Black vs. White. Man vs. Woman. McCain vs. Obama. Republican vs. Democrat. Conservatives vs. Liberal. Right vs. Left. Divide and Conquer. It’s as old as life itself. You could come up with many more groups that are constantly being pitted against one another. The New World order pays good money to keep these contemptuous relationships alive and well. Keep hating this group and that group. Keep blaming this group and that group. Hating and blaming. In the mean time with all this in-fighting amongst different factions it becomes impossible to unite against the one group who pays to keep all sides battling each other.

We can’t even see the real enemy, through the screams and cries of hatred against these well-known antagonists. Pro-Life vs. Pro-Choice. Heterosexual vs. homosexual. Environmentalists vs. Neo-Cons. All false paradigms. All sides bought and paid for by your friendly New World Order. Many of us are so blinded that we say this demonic enemy does not even exist. The New World Order is the same small elite group that have sold their souls in exchange for global domination. To defeat this morally devoid opponent we must unite.

The problem is the grand illusion they have so carefully crafted. By owning every group, and pitting them against each other, they who are the real enemy of all mankind become almost invisible and their very open conspiracy goes undetected by many and the object of their existence ridiculed by others.

The New World Order has perfected their craft of deception over the centuries largely through the ritualistic craft of freemasonry. Our country was founded by freemasons. We can look to the symbols of freemasonry around the world as evidence of their control of all affairs in all parts of the world. The freemason symbolism abounds in Washington D.C. and in governmental architecture across America and the world. Kennedy spoke out against such secret societies prior to his assasination.

The elites that run the world are psychopaths and control freaks. They are very smart and very ruthless. One maxim about the New World Order, is they always get what they pay for. In other words if people think our education system has problems, this would not be how the NWO would see the situation. To the NWO the education system is doing exactly what it is supposed to do. Dumb us down. They don’t want any critical thinkers. If jobs are hard to find that is what the NWO wants. (I am saying New World Order because our government runs nothing). If gas is ten dollars a gallon that is what the NWO wants. If your bank fails and you lose all your money, well it was planned that way a long time ago. They meticulously plan every detail through think tanks where they hire the brightest minds, with their unlimited funds, to plan their evil agenda.

s
We must wake up, stop fighting with each other, and unite in the infobattles and the infowars against the New World Order.

Peace, Wally Paul

Change We Can Believe In

US candidates practice their U-turns

By Max Deveson
BBC News, Washington

In order to pass their political driving test, successful politicians need to be masters of one tricky maneuver in particular - the U-turn.

Barack Obama (L) and John McCain (R), both pictured from behind
The candidates have shifted their positions on a number of policies

The contenders in this year's US presidential election are no exceptions - both John McCain and Barack Obama have engaged in some nifty repositioning.

Mr McCain's U-turns have mostly increased his appeal to the Republican Party's base, placing him on a rightward trajectory.

Barack Obama has been performing a more traditional maneuver: running to the left during the primaries, when party activists need to be wooed, then shifting to the center once the nomination is clinched.

Flip-flopping politicians will always attract charges of hypocrisy and opportunism: it may be worth it if it helps them win over undecided voters in the middle, but when the goal is to shore up their political base, the benefits are much less clear.

Here are some examples.

JOHN McCAIN

Having long been a member of his party's more moderate wing on a number of issues, Mr McCain began adopting more right-wing positions during the primary campaign.

Immigration

Last year, Mr McCain was one of the key backers of President Bush's plan for "comprehensive immigration reform", which would have created "paths to citizenship" for illegal immigrants, while investing more money in border security.

The plan was very unpopular with the Republican rank-and-file, and Senate Republicans succeeded in blocking the scheme.

During the primaries, Mr McCain announced that his immigration focus would be on securing America's borders, rather than on giving illegal immigrants the chance to become US citizens.

"I understand why you would call it a, quote, shift," McCain told reporters in November 2007.

"I say it is a lesson learned about what the American people's priorities are. And their priority is to secure the borders."

Christian right

Another McCain, quote, shift was in his relationship with the religious right of his party.

During his 2000 bid for the Republican nomination, relations between Mr McCain and Moral Majority founder Jerry Falwell were notoriously fractious.

The Arizona senator memorably described Mr Falwell and fellow members of the religious right as "agents of intolerance".

But in 2006, ahead of his second presidential run, Mr McCain delivered the commencement address at Mr Falwell's Liberty University, after which he attended a small private party hosted by his former political adversary.

Interrogation rules

More recently, Mr McCain angered his former allies in the political centre by supporting a bill exempting the CIA from following the same rules on interrogation as the US Army.

Guantanamo

Mr McCain was one of the most prominent Republican voices opposed to the Bush administration's detention policy in Guantanamo Bay.

But when the Supreme Court recently ruled that Guantanamo detainees should have access to US courts, Mr McCain described it as "one of the worst decisions in the history of the country".

Oil drilling

Since sewing up the Republican nomination in March, Mr McCain - one of only a few prominent Republicans to accept the argument that human activity is causing climate change - has dropped his previous objection to lifting the ban on oil exploration off the coast of the US.

BARACK OBAMA

Since clinching the Democratic nomination, Barack Obama has also been making headlines for his policy shifts.

Campaign finance

Last month he announced that he would be rejecting public financing for his campaign, and would instead rely on private donations.

The McCain camp accused Mr Obama of "going back on his word", although Mr Obama insisted that he had never made a promise to stay in the public finance system.

Surveillance programme

Mr Obama also raised eyebrows when he announced that he would not be opposing a bill going through Congress giving immunity to telephone companies involved in the Bush administration's controversial warrantless wiretap programme.

His decision angered many of his supporters on the left, who accused him of going back on his 2007 pledge "to support a filibuster of any bill that includes retroactive immunity for telecommunications companies".

Gun control

When the Supreme Court decided to overturn Washington DC's handgun ban, Mr Obama declared that the ruling "provide[d] much-needed guidance", despite having previously argued (in a written answer that he says was drafted by an aide and which he had not approved) that the ban was constitutional.

Iraq

Withdrawing troops from Iraq has long been one of the central planks of Mr Obama's campaign, and was something that set him apart from other Democratic candidates running for the party's presidential nomination.

Since his campaign began, however, conditions in Iraq have changed, violence has reduced, and some commentators have suggested that Mr Obama's position is out of date.

Mr Obama himself has announced that he plans to visit Iraq, where he will make "a thorough assessment" which could lead him to "refine" his policy.

Some critics have seized on this as an indication that Mr Obama is laying the groundwork for a change in position.

Free trade

Mr Obama recently hinted to Fortune magazine that his strong anti-free trade rhetoric during the primaries may not be reflected in his actual trade policy should he become president.

His remarks are a neat summation of the pressures and temptations that lead politicians to shift their positions during the process of running for office.

"Sometimes during campaigns the rhetoric gets overheated and amplified," he said.

"Politicians are always guilty of that, and I don't exempt myself."

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Aborted Babies for Vaccinations - Believe It

Wow. I'm glad I don't have to eat to throw up today. This is disturbing enough. Get in line everyone for your injections of aborted fetuses - I mean vaccinations. This is completely disturbing. What exactly are the benefits of creating a vaccination with the remnants of an aborted fetus? I don't know. I'm sure the people responsible for creating them don't know either. Except for maybe it's cost effective, since every thing today is dependent on how cost effective things are - like national security (or lack thereof ). I would like to pose a question that hasn't been answered. Have these fetuses been blood tested? How do we know we are not being injected with an aborted fetus that was carrying HIV? Because our health officials guarantee us they are not carriers? Right. The same people responsible for creating and spreading diseases, yet continuously deny it, are a credible source for truth.

You have to give them this though. They have balls. Or do they? They post the information on their sites for people to read. But it might not necessarily mean they have a pair of marbles the size of a hot air balloon. Perhaps it is because they are certain that a terrifyingly small fraction of the public would dare to do the research for themselves. Well guess what a couple of us did do the research and a couple of us did happen to vomit in light of such atrocities. Maybe they can use this writer's vomit for the next miracle cure.

So what can we do? We can do a couple things.

1) We can start with doing our homework before we take our kids to a clinic to be injected with a vaccine we know nothing about. It's your child. Know what you or your doctor is putting in their bodies.

2) We can ask questions. Did you know that our country was built by asking and answering questions? For example, is taxation without representation just? No. Congratulations you've just given birth to a 13 state baby America. Don't be intimidated by doctors. Ask them questions. It's their JOB to answer them.

3) We can say no to these vaccinations. Did you know your immune system can be boosted by simply eating food? You don't have to pay hundreds of dollars for shots. You already pay hundreds of dollars for groceries. Use those foods as your vaccination. Did you know that if no one showed up at a clinic to receive a vaccination they would cease to exist? Well, in theory they would. Unfortunately, you never know what your government will do next to stay in bed with its precious big-time corporations.

In the end, the decision belongs to you. You can accept these vaccinations as safe and helpful. You can go to sleep at night and think now that my children have their measles vaccination all is safe and right in the world.

Or, you can refuse to adhere to a falsified warning of sicknesses and realize they only tell you your children need them so they can make money. They don't give a damn about you or your children. If they did, they wouldn't use aborted fetuses to help our living, breathing children.

It is time to wake up. This country isn't all sunshines and rainbows. Now we all need to see that.

Don't believe me and Wally Paul? Check Sources. Sources from the companies themselves:[Rubella] [MMR Shot] [M-R-Vax] [Chickenpox]Created by: Merck & Co., Inc.Number: 800-672-6372[Hepatitis A]Created by: GlaxoSmithKline Number: 800.366.8900X 5231[Rabies Shot]Created by: Connaught Laboratories Number: 800.822.2463Also:The "Flu Vaccine" contains aborted tissue. Also look at www.informedchoice.info

I will also re-post the video.

Iran tests missiles, vows to hit back if attacked

TEHRAN (Reuters) - Iran test-fired nine missiles on Wednesday and warned the United States and Israel it was ready to retaliate if they attacked the Islamic Republic over its disputed nuclear projects.

Washington, which says Iran seeks atomic bombs, told Tehran to halt further tests if it wanted the world to trust it. Iran, the world's fourth largest oil producer, insists its nuclear program aims only at generating electricity.

Rising tensions have rattled financial markets. Oil prices, which had slipped from record highs, rebounded about $2 a barrel after Wednesday's tests.

Speculation that Israel could strike Iran ..

http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Iran_tests_missiles_vows_to_hit_0709.html

Aborted Babies Are Injected Into Our Children

Aborted Babies Are Injected Into Our Children
Wally Paul
http://infobattles.blogspot.com/
July 8, 2008

Merck Website – Do Search for mmr – Click on, Vaccinations: Newborns and Infants: Merck Manual Home Edition , and the second sentence says, "Vaccines are preparations that contain either fragments of bacteria or viruses or whole forms of these organisms that have been weakened so that they do not cause disease."

So, according to Merck’s own website my injection includes bacteria fragments or viruses. Maybe I could just drink a bacteria and virus cocktail on the way out to make sure I am really healthy. Nothing like injecting bacteria and viruses into your bloodstream to really make you healthy and vigorous.

On this same page Merck admits that a federal Vaccine Injury Compensation Program was established to compensate anyone suffering permanent consequences of vaccination. Then it goes on to say, "This program was established because doctors and health authorities want as many children as possible to be protected from life-threatening diseases."

They are your loving health authorities. You can’t say no, your authorities love you. After your injections you might get to lick your loving authorities boots. Oh, I hope there’s no viruses or stray fragments of bacteria on their boots. But, that would be good and nutritious for you.

This is where I got made as hell. After much searching I came across a pdf file, the url is http://www.merck.com/product/usa/pi_circulars/p/proquad/proquad_pi.pdf , and the title is "ProQuad, Measles, Mumps, Rubella, and Varicella Virus Vaccine Live."

In the first paragraph it states, "Rubella Virus live, the Wistar RA 27/3 strain of live attenuated rubella virus propagated in WI-38 Human Diploid Lung Fibroblasts.
I then had trouble confirming these came from fetuses. But, I stumbled across a page where they were actually selling various fetus components. I freaked out. I googled – order human diploid lung fibroblasts – and the first site gave me this page:
url was http://ccr.coriell.org/Sections/Collections/NIA/SpecialFibroblasts.aspx?PgId=325&coll=AG


Specially Characterized Normal Human Diploid Fibroblast Cultures
Under this heading you can see that many of these diploid cultures are also being bought and sold for anti-aging experimental injections. You see the catalog numbers and age of the fetuses. Somewhere on their site they must have pricing. I just could not go there. I am very sick now.

You can even choose where they come from. Blue-bloods will surely go for the British human diploid fibroblast cultures.

Catalog ID
Cell Type
Description
PopulationDoubling
Gender
Age
I90-78
Fibroblast
IMR-90 - NORMAL HUMAN FETAL LUNG FIBROBLAST
11
Female
16 FW
I90-79
Fibroblast
IMR-90 - NORMAL HUMAN FETAL LUNG FIBROBLAST
17
Female
16 FW
I90-10
Fibroblast
IMR-90 - NORMAL HUMAN FETAL LUNG FIBROBLAST
19
Female
16 FW
I90-15
Fibroblast
IMR-90 - NORMAL HUMAN FETAL LUNG FIBROBLAST
21
Female
16 FW
I90-19
Fibroblast
IMR-90 - NORMAL HUMAN FETAL LUNG FIBROBLAST
25
Female
16 FW
I90-24
Fibroblast
IMR-90 - NORMAL HUMAN FETAL LUNG FIBROBLAST
27
Female
16 FW
I90-26
Fibroblast
IMR-90 - NORMAL HUMAN FETAL LUNG FIBROBLAST
30
Female
16 FW
I90-33
Fibroblast
IMR-90 - NORMAL HUMAN FETAL LUNG FIBROBLAST
33
Female
16 FW
I90-40
Fibroblast
IMR-90 - NORMAL HUMAN FETAL LUNG FIBROBLAST
36
Female
16 FW
I90-52
Fibroblast
IMR-90 - NORMAL HUMAN FETAL LUNG FIBROBLAST
39
Female
16 FW
AG02804
Fibroblast
IMR-90 - SV40 VIRUS-TRANSFORMED FETAL LUNG FIBROBLAST

Female
16 FW
AG03204
Fibroblast
IMR-90 - SV40 VIRUS-TRANSFORMED FETAL LUNG FIBROBLAST
47
Female
16 FW
I91S-05
Fibroblast
IMR-91 - NORMAL HUMAN FETAL FIBROBLAST
10
Male
12 FW
I91S-06
Fibroblast
IMR-91 - NORMAL HUMAN FETAL FIBROBLAST
10
Male
12 FW
I91S-08
Fibroblast
IMR-91 - NORMAL HUMAN FETAL FIBROBLAST
11
Male
12 FW
I91S-04
Fibroblast
IMR-91 - NORMAL HUMAN FETAL FIBROBLAST
14
Male
12 FW
I91L-07
Fibroblast
IMR-91 - NORMAL HUMAN FETAL FIBROBLAST
15
Male
12 FW
I91L-12
Fibroblast
IMR-91 - NORMAL HUMAN FETAL FIBROBLAST
19
Male
12 FW
I91L-13
Fibroblast
IMR-91 - NORMAL HUMAN FETAL FIBROBLAST
22
Male
12 FW
I91L-15
Fibroblast
IMR-91 - NORMAL HUMAN FETAL FIBROBLAST
26
Male
12 FW
I91L-16
Fibroblast
IMR-91 - NORMAL HUMAN FETAL FIBROBLAST
30
Male
12 FW
I91L-17
Fibroblast
IMR-91 - NORMAL HUMAN FETAL FIBROBLAST
33
Male
12 FW
I91S-07
Fibroblast
IMR-91 - NORMAL HUMAN FETAL FIBROBLAST
36
Male
12 FW
AG05965-F
Fibroblast
MRC-5 - NORMAL HUMAN FETAL LUNG FIBROBLAST
17
Male
14 FW
AG05965-C
Fibroblast
MRC-5 - NORMAL HUMAN FETAL LUNG FIBROBLAST
27
Male
14 FW
AG05965-D
Fibroblast
MRC-5 - NORMAL HUMAN FETAL LUNG FIBROBLAST
40
Male
14 FW
AG10076
Fibroblast
MRC-5 - SV40 VIRUS-TRANSFORMED FETAL LUNG FIBROBLAST
94
Male
14 FW
AG06173
Fibroblast
TIG-1 - NORMAL HUMAN FETAL LUNG FIBROBLAST
17
Female
20 FW
AG06814-N
Fibroblast
WI-38 - NORMAL HUMAN FETAL LUNG FIBROBLAST
15
Female
12 FW
AG06814-K
Fibroblast
WI-38 - NORMAL HUMAN FETAL LUNG FIBROBLAST
34
Female
12 FW
AG06814-J
Fibroblast
WI-38 - NORMAL HUMAN FETAL LUNG FIBROBLAST
44
Female
12 FW
AG07217
Fibroblast




I just kept saying, "Oh my god, Oh my God, they are selling the cells and parts of aborted babies and injecting them into us and our children." This is so sick. I had no idea. Watch the video below it is true. I watched it first. Then did the research using Merck’s own site. And now I am very sick.

Peace. Wally Paul

Vaccines - The Ingredient That Has Made Me Mad as Hell

This video is not meant to convince you, but to get you to do the research and confirm what's stated. Check Sources. Sources from the companies themselves:[Rubella] [MMR Shot] [M-R-Vax] [Chickenpox]Created by: Merck & Co., Inc.Number: 800-672-6372[Hepatitis A]Created by: GlaxoSmithKline Number: 800.366.8900X 5231[Rabies Shot]Created by: Connaught Laboratories Number: 800.822.2463Also:The "Flu Vaccine" contains aborted tissue. Also look at www.informedchoice.info

No Bill Of Rights

The Truth About Vaccines

Ron Paul Warns of Chaos to be Released Soon

Ron Paul Warns of Chaos to be Released Soon
Wally Paul
Infobattles.blogspot.com
July 3, 2008

Ron Paul writes in an article, “Something Big is Going On” posted on Ron Paul’s Campaign for Liberty blog, July 3, 2008 “Time is short for making a course correction before this grand experiment in liberty goes into deep hibernation.”

This sounds very ominous coming from Ron Paul who tends to understate the severity of many situations. He is not given to gratuitous fearmongering. For Ron Paul to offer such an apocalyptical warning in respect to our nation is frightening.

He goes on to say that he has reasons to believe the coming crisis will be different and bigger than the world has ever experienced.

Details of what Paul envisions:
$4.00 a gallon is just the beginning
A rejection of the principles of liberty
Bigger and more authoritarian government
Dictatorial executive powers
Americans seeking security over freedom
The world economy and political system will share in the chaos about to be unleashed
Empire building, financed through inflation and debt


There is a way out according to Ron Paul and that is to continue the revolution that began in 1776.


“All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent.”
- Thomas Jefferson

IN CONGRESS, JULY 4, 1776

IN CONGRESS, JULY 4, 1776

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America

When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. — Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.

He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their Public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.

He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.

He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected, whereby the Legislative Powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.

He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.

He has obstructed the Administration of Justice by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary Powers.

He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.

He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.

He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil Power.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:

For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:

For protecting them, by a mock Trial from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:

For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:

For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:

For depriving us in many cases, of the benefit of Trial by Jury:

For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences:

For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies

For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:

For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.

He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation, and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & Perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.

He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.

He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these united Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States, that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. — And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor.

— John Hancock

New Hampshire:
Josiah Bartlett, William Whipple, Matthew Thornton

Massachusetts:
John Hancock, Samuel Adams, John Adams, Robert Treat Paine, Elbridge Gerry

Rhode Island:
Stephen Hopkins, William Ellery

Connecticut:
Roger Sherman, Samuel Huntington, William Williams, Oliver Wolcott

New York:
William Floyd, Philip Livingston, Francis Lewis, Lewis Morris

New Jersey:
Richard Stockton, John Witherspoon, Francis Hopkinson, John Hart, Abraham Clark

Pennsylvania:
Robert Morris, Benjamin Rush, Benjamin Franklin, John Morton, George Clymer, James Smith, George Taylor, James Wilson, George Ross

Delaware:
Caesar Rodney, George Read, Thomas McKean

Maryland:
Samuel Chase, William Paca, Thomas Stone, Charles Carroll of Carrollton

Virginia:
George Wythe, Richard Henry Lee, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Harrison, Thomas Nelson, Jr., Francis Lightfoot Lee, Carter Braxton

North Carolina:
William Hooper, Joseph Hewes, John Penn

South Carolina:
Edward Rutledge, Thomas Heyward, Jr., Thomas Lynch, Jr., Arthur Middleton

Georgia:
Button Gwinnett, Lyman Hall, George Walton

Supreme Court Gun Ruling Bad For Gun Owners: Not A Victory

Supreme Court Gun Ruling Bad For Gun Owners: Not A Victory
June-28-2008http://Infowars.blogspot.net
Wally Paul

Thursday the U.S. Supreme Court released their opinion on the District of Columbia gun ban case. D.C. vs. Heller. Leaders of the National Rifle Association (NRA) praised the Supreme Court’s historic ruling overturning Washington D.C.’s ban on handguns and on self-defense in the home, in the case of District of Columbia v. Heller. Read the opinion (1 MB)
"This is a great moment in American history. It vindicates individual Americans all over this country who have always known that their freedom is worth protecting," declared NRA Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre. "Our founding fathers wrote and intended the Second Amendment to be an individual right. The Supreme Court has now acknowledged it. The Second Amendment as an individual right now becomes a real permanent part of American Constitutional law."
The NRA and all the mainstream media are putting up a big smoke screen so gun rights advocates will celebrate a great victory and go to sleep while Federal, State, and local governments pass restrictions and set even more stringent licensing requirements for gun owners.
The court ruled that the Second Amendment did guarantee an individual’s right to bear arms, but also went on to say that the government still has the right to control and regulate firearms. What happened to this is an inalienable right, which shall not be infringed.
Lee Rodgers from Rogue Government. Com said, "The mainstream press is hailing this as a victory for gun owners and a defeat for anti-American gun control advocates. Unfortunately, this is incredibly misleading spin by the mainstream press as the ruling essentially says that the government still has the authority to implement regulations to control who has access to firearms and who doesn’t. The Second Amendment specifically states that the right to bear arms shall not be infringed, yet these egghead Supreme Court Justices have gone out of their way to try to redefine what it actually means. Either these Supreme Court Justices can’t read or they have been paid off by the criminals that run the federal government. Not only that, but it is incredibly frightening that the court only ruled 5-4 in favor of the Second Amendment with limitations. The dissenting Justices essentially said that the people don’t have the right to bear arms. It doesn’t get much more insane than this. This is totally unacceptable, as the main purpose of the Second Amendment is to ensure that the people can stand up against a tyrannical government and defend their lives, liberty and property. This ruling is more proof that the establishment is continuing its agenda of disarming the American people so they can setup a global dictatorship of death."

The following is taken from a Reuters report which summarizes what Justice Antonin Scalia said on behalf of the majority opinion.
In the majority opinion, Justice Antonin Scalia said the Second Amendment protected an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home. Although an individual now has a constitutional right to own guns, that new right is not unlimited, wrote Scalia, a hunter.
He said the ruling should not be taken to cast doubt on long-standing prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill or on laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in places like schools and government buildings or laws imposing conditions on gun sales.
This is proof that Scalia and the other Justices in the majority opinion simply do not have an understanding of the Second Amendment or refuse to interpret it properly. The Constitution and the Bill of Rights were written so that the vast majority of people could understand them. They were not written so that only lawyers and judges could understand its contents. Let’s take a look at the full text of the Second Amendment.
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
In Response to Scalia Lee Rodgers of Roguegovernment.com said, "The words "shall not be infringed" is what is key. The Second Amendment doesn’t say that the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed except in certain cases. It doesn’t get anymore clear than this yet Scalia and the majority opinion Justices some how get the impression that the right to bear arms is not unlimited? How can someone make such a statement and be a Supreme Court Justice? This is proof that Scalia and the other Supreme Court Justices in the majority opinion are not competent to hold office and should be removed immediately. The founding fathers were saying that the right to bear arms is an inalienable right. Any regulation of firearms is unconstitutional and the government does not have the authority under the Constitution to dictate who is allowed to bear arms and who doesn’t.
I love what Lee Rodgers is saying here. He has more wisdom and common sense than all nine justices. This is not a good ruling . It is being spun as a great thing for gun owners. But only so they will all go to sleep and stop paying attention to further regulation. They can make getting a gun such a difficult process that most people will not bother. They did not triple the size of the ATF for nothing. The elites need to take our weapons to fulfill their dream of total tyranny. Gun Owners must remain vigilant and watch even more carefully for gun control measures.
What is really crazy is that the NRA is hailing this as a victory. The NRA is a smoke screen for gun control. Join Gun Owners of America. The NRA is an imposter posing as gun rights group.
The NRA knows this is a smoke screen. The NRA is part of the globalist elite’s mind control. They have many members that are being fooled. The NRA has been a big weapon in gun regulation for the power brokers for decades. The agenda is to keep chipping away at our gun rights and all our rights until the American people are totally enslaved by the New World order.
People should be on the steps of the Supreme Court building protesting this ruling everyday. Instead the New World Order will sit and laugh at all the sheep with the wool once again pulled over their eyes. Look at the sheep they think they had a victory. Sleep Sheep. Sleep.

The War is on US All - Zeitgeist movie excerpts

People Are Afraid

People Are Afraid
Wally Paul
Infobattles.Blogspot.com
Saturday June 28, 2008
Gas Prices over $4.00. Terrorism. War. Floods. Home Mortgages. Dollar Exploding. Starvation. Food Prices. Genetically modified Food. No Bees. Chemtrails. Fluoride in water. Approaching tyranny. Crisis. Crisis. Crisis.
People today are afraid, anxious, concerned, nervous, troubled, and worried. They know something is wrong. Most are not sure what. When they wake up they will know that we have been overtaken by absolute tyranny, subject to arbitrary despotism, and living in a completely oppressive authoritarian police state.
We are stepping through the door into the darkness of global governance. This is total tyranny and part of a very old plan. The illusion of the government that we thought was great was truly an intentional illusion. Most people will freak out as we go further into the transition to total slavery. People want to deny the approaching reality and try to hold onto their old reality. The old perceived reality has been destroyed. We are in a transition and the globalist control freaks are establishing new norms. There was an abnormal culture change brought to us by the corporate controlled media in the 60’s and 70’s. American culture was completely changed. People simply adapt to what they see on television and what they are exposed to from the corporate media. It is massive mind control. We are to all be standardized.
The global elites literally want to reduce the world’s population to 10 to 20 percent of what it is now. They are literally creating a new human species. New humans are being created now with DNA engineering. When new types of humans are presented to us we will be conditioned to accept it from movies and fiction. The marketing job will be so complete that people will be begging for their implanted brain microchip. In the 1920’s Eugenic Societies published many books about the future society where people would be scientifically programmed, with some people allowed to breed and others not allowed to breed.
The mind controllers are masters in marketing. They use subtle techniques continuously to control the minds of the masses. They have dumbed us down and now we wait like cattle to the slaughter. How do you standardize people? You standardize their education. The same things must be taught everywhere. Repetition. Repetition. Repetition. We hear things over and over and begin to regurgitate the slogans and soundbites. Critical Thinkers are rare. Clouds of reality and distorted minds are downloaded with their daily dose of group think and repetitive group speak. We are all subjects of extraordinary scientific indoctrination. We get updated with continuing education through propaganda, and by the big marketing companies that work continuously to keep the flock moving along the path of their agenda. Most people cannot come out of this fog because the elite globalist plan is so diabolical, heinous, and demonic, that most people will laugh in your face when you try to explain the ominous scheme of our owners.
Deprogram your mind. Dare to think. Dare to stand for truth and hold your ground.

SoundClick Widgets Basic

Now playing: Three Shoes Posse

FBI Mortgage Fraud Crackdown

Fluoride Dangers - Your Government Loves You

Professional Perspective on Flouride

Towns Question Flouride Use

Towns question flouride use
Some oppose the chemical's presence in water supply
By Tim Jones | Chicago Tribune correspondent
10:35 AM CDT, June 23, 2008
Article tools
E-mail Share
Digg Del.icio.us Facebook Fark Google Newsvine Reddit Yahoo Print Reprints Post comment Text size: GRAND RAPIDS, Mich.—The great American assault on tooth decay began here 63 years ago, earning Grand Rapids a special place in the annals of dental history: the first city in the world to fluoridate its public water system.

So it is more than a little head-scratching that fluoride, the chemical widely credited with dramatically cutting cavities and promoting oral hygiene, is having its scientific credentials questioned in the city that literally swallowed it first.

The belated questioning of fluoride in the most unlikely of places stems partly from unsettled questions—some new, some old—about possible links to cancer and thyroid and kidney problems if too much fluoride is ingested. But the push here mirrors a spreading nationwide awareness and re-examination of the health impact of a wide variety of chemicals added to food, health-care products and water, as well as the use of pesticides.



Unusual findings
Local and state governments around the nation are taking a second — and in some cases a first — look at chemical practices and their potential impact. A county in Utah has stopped encouraging people to flush unused prescription drugs down the toilet because they might contaminate the water system. That action was taken after a report from the U.S. Geological Survey found chemicals from prescription drugs in streams and rivers.



Related links
Fluoride in our water supplies A Tribune examination of Chicago's drinking water this year found traces of pharmaceuticals and personal-care products.

In California, several communities are cracking down on aerial pesticide spraying because of its potential impact on humans and animals. Experts predict that in-depth examinations of chemicals formerly considered benign will become more frequent.

"I think this pattern has been growing because there is better environmental health research that draws connections between low levels of chemical exposure and changes in our bodies," said Dr. Howard Hu, chairman of environmental health sciences at the University of Michigan.

"As the research has become more sophisticated, it shows that environmental toxicants can do other things beyond just kill you—they can stunt your growth, change behavior and increase the risk of cardiovascular disease," Hu said.



'On my radar screen'
Fluoride fights stretch back more than a half-century. Recent studies, though, suggest a possible link to thyroid trouble and problems for people on dialysis. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention maintains that water fluoridation is a safe and cost-effective way to prevent tooth decay, but some scientists say questions about the long-term impact cannot be dismissed.

Recent studies, while not conclusive, convinced Corky Overmyer, the director of environmental sustainability for Grand Rapids, that a review was needed to study fluoride's impact on the 11 communities served by the city's water system.

"This has been on my radar screen for a while," said Overmyer, who several years ago led the effort to remove chlorine from the city's water. Overmyer insists he has drawn no conclusions about the safety of fluoride.

Grand Rapids commemorates the 1945 fluoridation with a 30-foot sculpture in the heart of downtown, and the questioning of fluoride has stirred controversy. Dentists have doubted or condemned the effort, and the Grand Rapids Press counseled caution in an editorial.

Grand Rapids, long known as a furniture-making city, is working to reinvent itself as a center of medical research. The timing of the fluoride examination is, at best, awkward because some of the most prominent groups in the medical establishment—the American Dental Association, the American Medical Association and the CDC—have endorsed fluoride.

"They tend to look at little bits of information that are taken out of context," Dr. Howard Pollick, a dentist and chief spokesman for the ADA, said of fluoride opponents.

Overmyer said he is taking heat.

"I had no idea [fluoride] was that sensitive an issue," he said, noting he has "teeth marks" in his backside from his dentist and the city's mayor, who declined to return phone calls to discuss fluoride.

About two-thirds of Americans, including those in Chicago and most major metropolitan areas, are served by fluoridated water. Resistance to fluoride usually is localized, with battles occurring in small towns. In May, voters in two Massachusetts towns overwhelmingly rejected efforts to fluoridate the water.

The Internet has effectively re-energized the former ragtag group of activists by making new information—valid or not—instantly available.

And the re-examination by Grand Rapids, the mother of fluoride, has provided an unanticipated boost for opponents.

"If Grand Rapids falls, that could be the beginning of the end of fluoride," said Paul Connett, a retired chemistry professor and director of the Fluoride Action Network, which advocates against fluoridation.

There is strong political and medical resistance to reversing the fluoride policy. Dr. Tim Gietzen, who has practiced dentistry in Grand Rapids for 30 years, said he can tell which of his patients grew up with fluoridated water just by looking in their mouths.

Gietzen said fluoride should remain in the water system "unless someone is causing problems."

That's the question to be pursued by Overmyer, who said, "I'm just trying to be honest and open, and I've become a lightning rod."

tmjones@tribune.com

Aldous Huxley, 1962 Transcript of Berkeley Speech

June 19, 2008

This is the transcript to Aldous Huxley's Berkeley 1962 Speech.

http://cuttingthroughthematrix.ca/articles/hux1.ram
http://cuttingthroughthematrix.ca/articles/hux2.ram

{Applause}

Uh, First of all, the, I'd like to say, that the conference at Santa Barbara was not directly concerned with the control of the mind. That was a conference, there have been two of them now, at the University of California Medical center in San Francisco, one this year which I didn't attend, and one two years ago where there was a considerable discussion on this subject. At Santa Barbara we were talking about technology in general and the effects it's likely to have on society and the problems related to technological transplanting of technology into underdeveloped countries.

Well now in regard to this problem of the ultimate revolution, this has been very well summed up by the moderator. In the past we can say that all revolutions have essentially aimed at changing the environment in order to change the individual. I mean there's been the political revolution, the economic revolution, in the time of the reformation, the religious revolution. All these aimed, not directly at the human being, but at his surroundings. So that by modifying the surroundings you did achieve, did one remove the effect of the human being.

Today we are faced, I think, with the approach of what may be called the ultimate revolution, the final revolution, where man can act directly on the mind-body of his fellows. Well needless to say some kind of direct action on human mind-bodies has been going on since the beginning of time. But this has generally been of a violent nature. The Techniques of terrorism have been known from time immemorial and people have employed them with more or less ingenuity sometimes with the utmost cruelty, sometimes with a good deal of skill acquired by a process of trial and error finding out what the best ways of using torture, imprisonment, constraints of various kinds.

But, as, I think it was (sounds like Mettenicht) said many years ago, you can do everything with {garbled} except sit on them. If you are going to control any population for any length of time, you must have some measure of consent, it's exceedingly difficult to see how pure terrorism can function indefinitely. It can function for a fairly long time, but I think sooner or later you have to bring in an element of persuasion an element of getting people to consent to what is happening to them.

It seems to me that the nature of the ultimate revolution with which we are now faced is precisely this: That we are in process of developing a whole series of techniques which will enable the controlling oligarchy who have always existed and presumably will always exist to get people to love their servitude. This is the, it seems to me, the ultimate in malevolent revolutions shall we say, and this is a problem which has interested me many years and about which I wrote thirty years ago, a fable, Brave New World, which is an account of society making use of all the devices available and some of the devices which I imagined to be possible making use of them in order to, first of all, to standardize the population, to iron out inconvenient human differences, to create, to say, mass produced models of human beings arranged in some sort of scientific caste system. Since then, I have continued to be extremely interested in this problem and I have noticed with increasing dismay a number of the predictions which were purely fantastic when I made them thirty years ago have come true or seem in process of coming true.

A number of techniques about which I talked seem to be here already. And there seems to be a general movement in the direction of this kind of ultimate revolution, a method of control by which a people can be made to enjoy a state of affairs by which any decent standard they ought not to enjoy. This, the enjoyment of servitude, Well this process is, as I say, has gone on for over the years, and I have become more and more interested in what is happening.

And here I would like briefly to compare the parable of Brave New World with another parable which was put forth more recently in George Orwell's book, Nineteen Eighty- Four. Orwell wrote his book between, I think between 45 and 48 at the time when the Stalinist terror regime was still in Full swing and just after the collapse of the Hitlerian terror regime. And his book which I admire greatly, it's a book of very great talent and extraordinary ingenuity, shows, so to say, a projection into the future of the immediate past, of what for him was the immediate past, and the immediate present, it was a projection into the future of a society where control was exercised wholly by terrorism and violent attacks upon the mind-body of individuals.

Whereas my own book which was written in 1932 when there was only a mild dictatorship in the form of Mussolini in existence, was not overshadowed by the idea of terrorism, and I was therefore free in a way in which Orwell was not free, to think about these other methods of control, these non-violent methods and my, I'm inclined to think that the scientific dictatorships of the future, and I think there are going to be scientific dictatorships in many parts of the world, will be probably a good deal nearer to the brave new world pattern than to the 1984 pattern, they will a good deal nearer not because of any humanitarian qualms of the scientific dictators but simply because the BNW pattern is probably a good deal more efficient than the other.

That if you can get people to consent to the state of affairs in which they're living. The state of servitude the state of being, having their differences ironed out, and being made amenable to mass production methods on the social level, if you can do this, then you have, you are likely, to have a much more stable and lasting society. Much more easily controllable society than you would if you were relying wholly on clubs and firing squads and concentration camps. So that my own feeling is that the 1984 picture was tinged of course by the immediate past and present in which Orwell was living, but the past and present of those years does not reflect, I feel, the likely trend of what is going to happen, needless to say we shall never get rid of terrorism, it will always find its way to the surface.

But I think that insofar as dictators become more and more scientific, more and more concerned with the technically perfect, perfectly running society, they will be more and more interested in the kind of techniques which I imagined and described from existing realities in BNW. So that, it seems to me then, that this ultimate revolution is not really very far away, that we, already a number of techniques for bringing about this kind of control are here, and it remains to be seen when and where and by whom they will first be applied in any large scale.

And first let me talk about the, a little bit about the, improvement in the techniques of terrorism. I think there have been improvements. Pavlov after all made some extremely profound observations both on animals and on human beings. And he found among other things that conditioning techniques applied to animals or humans in a state either of psychological or physical stress sank in so to say, very deeply into the mind-body of the creature, and were extremely difficult to get rid of. That they seemed to be embedded more deeply than other forms of conditioning.

And this of course, this fact was discovered empirically in the past. People did make use of many of these techniques, but the difference between the old empirical intuitive methods and our own methods is the difference between the, a sort of, hit and miss craftsman's point of view and the genuinely scientific point of view. I think there is a real difference between ourselves and say the inquisitors of the 16th century. We know much more precisely what we are doing, than they knew and we can extend because of our theoretical knowledge, we can extend what we are doing over a wider area with a greater assurance of being producing something that really works.

In this context I would like to mention the extremely interesting chapters in Dr. William (sounds like Seargent's) Battle for the Mind where he points out how intuitively some of the great religious teachers/leaders of the past hit on the Pavlovian method, he speaks specifically of Wesley's method of producing conversions which were essentially based on the technique of heightening psychological stress to the limit by talking about hellfire and so making people extremely vulnerable to suggestion and then suddenly releasing this stress by offering hopes of heaven and this is a very interesting chapter of showing how completely on purely intuitive and empirical grounds a skilled natural psychologist, as Wesley was, could discover these Pavlovian methods.

Well, as I say, we now know the reason why these techniques worked and there's no doubt at all that we can if we wanted to, carry them much further than was possible in the past. And of course in the history of, recent history of brainwashing, both as applied to prisoners of war and to the lower personnel within the communist party in China, we see that the pavlovian methods have been applied systematically and with evidently with extraordinary efficacy. I think there can be no doubt that by the application of these methods a very large army of totally devoted people has been created. The conditioning has been driven in, so to say, by a kind of psychological iontophoresis into the very depths of the people's being, and has got so deep that it's very difficult to ever be rooted out, and these methods, I think, are a real refinement on the older methods of terror because they combine methods of terror with methods of acceptance that the person who is subjected to a form of terroristic stress but for the purpose of inducing a kind of voluntary quotes acceptance of the state the psychological state in which he has been driven and the state of affairs in which he finds himself.

So there is, as I say, there has been a definite improvement in the, even in the techniques of terrorism. But then we come to the consideration of other techniques, non-terroristic techniques, for inducing consent and inducing people to love their servitude. Here, I don't think I can possibly go into all of them, because I don't know all of them, but I mean I can mention the more obvious methods, which can now be used and are based on recent scientific findings. First of all there are the methods connected with straight suggestion and hypnosis.

I think we know much more about this subject than was known in the past. People of course, always have known about suggestion, and although they didn't know the word 'hypnosis' they certainly practiced it in various ways. But we have, I think, a much greater knowledge of the subject than in the past, and we can make use of our knowledge in ways, which I think the past was never able to make use of it. For example, one of the things we now know for certain, that there is of course an enormous, I mean this has always been known a very great difference between individuals in regard to their suggestibility. But we now know pretty clearly the sort of statistical structure of a population in regard to its suggestibility. Its very interesting when you look at the findings of different fields, I mean the field of hypnosis, the field of administering placebos, for example, in the field of general suggestion in states of drowsiness or light sleep you will find the same sorts of orders of magnitude continually cropping up.

You'll find for example that the experienced hypnotist will tell one that the number of people, the percentage of people who can be hypnotized with the utmost facility (snaps), just like that. is about 20%, and about a corresponding number at the other end of the scale are very, very difficult or almost impossible to hypnotize. But in between lies a large mass of people who can with more or less difficulty be hypnotized, that they can gradually be if you work hard enough at it be got into the hypnotic state, and in the same way the same sort of figures crop up again, for example in relation to the administration of placebos.

A big experiment was carried out three of four years ago in the general hospital in Boston on post-operative cases where several hundred men and woman suffering comparable kinds of pain after serious operations were allowed to, were given injections whenever they asked for them whenever the pain got bad, and the injections were 50% of the time were of morphine, and 50% of water. And about twenty percent of those who went through the experiment, about 20% of them got just as much relief from the distilled waters as from the morphea. About 20% got no relief from the distilled water, and in- between were those who got some relief or got relief occasionally.

So yet again, we see the same sort of distribution, and similarly in regard to what in BNW I called Hypnopedia, the sleep teaching, I was talking not long ago to a man who manufactures records which people can listen to in the, during the light part of sleep, I mean these are records for getting rich, for sexual satisfaction (crowd laughs), for confidence in salesmanship and so on, and he said that its very interesting that these are records sold on a money-back basis, and he says there is regularly between 15% and 20% of people who write indignantly saying the records don't work at all, and he sends the money back at once. There are on the other hand, there are over 20% who write enthusiastically saying they are much richer, their sexual life is much better (laughter) etc, etc. And these of course are the dream clients and they buy more of these records. And in between there are those who don't get much results and they have to have letters written to them saying "Go persist my dear, go on" (laughter) and you will get there, and they generally do get results in the long run.

Well, as I say, on the basis of this, I think we see quite clearly that the human populations can be categorized according to their suggestibility fairly clearly,. I suspect very strongly that this twenty percent is the same in all these cases, and I suspect also that it would not be at all difficult to recognize and {garbled} out who are those who are extremely suggestible and who are those extremely unsuggestible and who are those who occupy the intermediate space. Quite clearly, if everybody were extremely unsuggestible organized society would be quite impossible, and if everybody were extremely suggestible then a dictatorship would be absolutely inevitable. I mean it's very fortunate that we have people who are moderately suggestible in the majority and who therefore preserve us from dictatorship but do permit organized society to be formed. But, once given the fact that there are these 20% of highly suggestible people, it becomes quite clear that this is a matter of enormous political importance, for example, any demagogue who is able to get hold of a large number of these 20% of suggestible people and to organize them is really in a position to overthrow any government in any country.

And I mean, I think this after all, we had the most incredible example in recent years by what can be done by efficient methods of suggestion and persuasion in the form of Hitler. Anyone who has read, for example, (Sounds like Bulloch's) Life of Hitler, comes forth with this horrified admiration for this infernal genius, who really understood human weaknesses I think almost better than anybody and who exploited them with all the resources then available. I mean he knew everything, for example, he knew intuitively this pavlovian truth that condition installed in a state of stress or fatigue goes much deeper than conditioning installed at other times. This of course is why all his big speeches were organized at night. He speaks quite frankly, of course, in Mein Kampf, this is done solely because people are tired at night and therefore much less capable of resisting persuasion than they would be during the day. And in all his techniques he was using, he had discovered intuitively and by trial and error a great many of the weaknesses, which we now know about on a sort of scientific way I think much more clearly than he did.

But the fact remains that this differential of suggestibility this susceptibility to hypnosis I do think is something which has to be considered very carefully in relation to any kind of thought about democratic government . If there are 20% of the people who really can be suggested into believing almost anything, then we have to take extremely careful steps into prevent the rise of demagogues who will drive them on into extreme positions then organize them into very, very dangerous armies, private armies which may overthrow the government.

This is, I say, in this field of pure persuasion, I think we do know much more than we did in the past, and obviously we now have mechanisms for multiplying the demagogues voice and image in a quite hallucinatory way, I mean, the TV and radio, Hitler was making enormous use of the radio, he could speak to millions of people simultaneously. This alone creates an enormous gulf between the modern and the ancient demagogue. The ancient demagogue could only appeal to as many people as his voice could reach by yelling at his utmost, but the modern demagogue could touch literally millions at a time, and of course by the multiplication of his image he can produce this kind of hallucinatory effect which is of enormous hypnotic and suggestive importance.

But then there are the various other methods one can think of which, thank heaven, as yet have not be used, but which obviously could be used. There is for example, the pharmacological method, this is one of the things I talked about in BNW. I invented a hypothetical drug called SOMA, which of course could not exist as it stood there because it was simultaneously a stimulant, a narcotic, and a hallucinogen, which seems unlikely in one substance. But the point is, if you applied several different substances you could get almost all these results even now, and the really interesting things about the new chemical substances, the new mind-changing drugs is this, if you looking back into history its clear that man has always had a hankering after mind changing chemicals, he has always desired to take holidays from himself, but the, and, this is the most extraordinary effect of all that every natural occurring narcotic stimulant, sedative, or hallucinogen, was discovered before the dawn of history, I don't think there is one single one of these naturally occurring ones which modern science has discovered.

Modern science has of course better ways of extracting the active principals of these drugs and of course has discovered numerous ways of synthesizing new substances of extreme power, but the actual discovery of these naturally occurring things was made by primitive man goodness knows how many centuries ago. There is for example, in the underneath the, lake dwellings of the early Neolithic that have been dug up in Switzerland we have found poppy-heads, which looks as though people were already using this most ancient and powerful and dangerous of narcotics, even before the days of the rise of agriculture. So that man was apparently a dope-bag addict before he was a farmer, which is a very curious comment on human nature.

But, the difference, as I say, between the ancient mind-changers, the traditional mind- changers, and the new substances is that they were extremely harmful and the new ones are not. I mean even the permissible mind-changer alcohol is not entirely harmless, as people may have noticed, and I mean the other ones, the non-permissible ones, such as opium and cocaine, opium and its derivatives, are very harmful indeed. They rapidly produce addiction, and in some cases lead at an extraordinary rate to physical degeneration and death.

Whereas these new substances, this is really very extraordinary, that a number of these new mind-changing substances can produce enormous revolutions within the mental side of our being, and yet do almost nothing to the physiological side. You can have an enormous revolution, for example, with LSD-25 or with the newly synthesized drug psilocybin, which is the active principal of the Mexican sacred mushroom. You can have this enormous mental revolution with no more physiological revolution than you would get from drinking two cocktails. And this is a really most extraordinary effect.

And it is of course true that pharmacologists are producing a great many new wonder drugs where the cure is almost worse than the disease. Every year the new edition of medical textbooks contains a longer and longer chapter of what are Iatrogenic diseases, that is to say diseases caused by doctors (laughter} And this is quite true, many of the wonder drugs are extremely dangerous. I mean they can produce extraordinary effects, and in critical conditions they should certainly be used, but they should be used with the utmost caution. But there is evidently a whole class of drugs effecting the CNS which can produce enormous changes in sedation in euphoria in energizing the whole mental process without doing any perceptible harm to the human body, and this presents to me the most extraordinary revolution. In the hands of a dictator these substances in one kind or the other could be used with, first of all, complete harmlessness, and the result would be, you can imagine a euphoric that would make people thoroughly happy even in the most abominable circumstances.

I mean these things are possible. This is the extraordinary thing, I mean after all this is even true with the crude old drugs. I mean, a housemate years ago remarked after reading Milton's Paradise Lost, He Says "And beer does more than Milton can to justify God's ways to man" (laughter). And beer is of course, an extremely crude drug compared to these ones. And you can certainly say that some of the psychic energizers and the new hallucinants could do incomparably more than Milton and all the Theologicians combined could possibly do to make the terrifying mystery of our existence seem more tolerable than it does. And here I think one has an enormous area in which the ultimate revolution could function very well indeed, an area in which a great deal of control could be used by not through terror, but by making life seem much more enjoyable than it normally does. Enjoyable to the point, where as I said before, Human beings come to love a state of things by which any reasonable and decent human standard they ought not to love and this I think is perfectly possible.

But then, very briefly, let me speak about one of the more recent developments in the sphere of neurology, about the implantation of electrodes in the brain. This of course has been done in the large scale in animals and in a few cases its been done in the cases of the hopelessly insane. And anybody who has watched the behavior of rats with electrodes placed in different centers must come away from this experience with the most extraordinary doubts about what on Earth is in store for us if this is got a hold of by a dictator. I saw not long ago some rats in the {garbled} laboratory at UCLA there were two sets of them, one with electrodes planted in the pleasure center, and the technique was they had a bar which they pressed which turned on a very small current for a short space of time which we had a wire connected with that electrode and which stimulated the pleasure center and was evidently absolutely ecstatic was these rats were pressing the bar 18,000 times a day (laughter). Apparently if you kept them from pressing the bar for a day, they'd press it 36,000 times on the following day and would until they fell down in complete exhaustion (laughter) And they would neither eat, nor be interested in the opposite sex but would just go on pressing this bar {pounds on podium}

Then the most extraordinary rats were those were the electrode was planted halfway between the pleasure and the pain center. The result was a kind of mixture of the most wonderful ecstasy and like being on the rack at the same time. And you would see the rats sort of looking at is bar and sort of saying "To be or not to be that is the question". (Laughter) Finally it would approach {Pounds on podium} and go back with this awful I mean, the (sounds like franken huminizer anthropomorphizer), and he would wait some time before pressing the bar again, yet he would always press it again. This was the extraordinary thing.

I noticed in the most recent issue of Scientific American there's a very interesting article on electrodes in the brains of chickens, where the technique is very ingenious, where you sink into their brains a little socket with a screw on it and the electrode can then be screwed deeper and deeper into the brainstem and you can test at any moment according to the depth, which goes at fractions of the mm, what you're stimulating and these creatures are not merely stimulated by wire, they're fitted with a miniature radio receiver which weighs less than an ounce which is attached to them so that they can be communicated with at a distance, I mean they can run about in the barnyard and you could press a button and this particular area of the brain to which the electrode has been screwed down to would be stimulated. You would get this fantastic phenomena, where a sleeping chicken would jump up and run about, or an active chicken would suddenly sit down and go to sleep, or a hen would sit down and act like she's hatching out an egg, or a fighting rooster would go into depression.

The whole picture of the absolute control of the drives is terrifying, and in the few cases in which this has been done with very sick human beings, The effects are evidently very remarkable too, I was talking last summer in England to Grey Walter, who is the most eminent exponent of the EEG technique in England, and he was telling me that he's seen hopeless inmates at asylums with these things in their heads, and these people were suffering from uncontrollable depression, and they had these electrodes inserted into the pleasure center in their brain, however when they felt too bad, they just pressed a button on the battery in their pocket and he said the results were fantastic, the mouth pointing down would suddenly turn up and they'd feel very cheerful and happy. So there again one sees the most extraordinary revolutionary techniques, which are now available to us.

Now, I think what is obviously perfectly clear is that for the present these techniques are not being used except in an experimental way, but I think it is important for us to realize what is happening to make ourselves acquainted with what has already happened, and then use a certain amount of imagination to extrapolate into the future the sort of things that might happen. What might happen if these fantastically powerful techniques were used by unscrupulous people in authority, what on Earth would happen, what sort of society would we get?

And I think it is peculiarly important because as one sees when looking back over history we have allowed in the past all those advances in technology which has profoundly changed our social and individual life to take us by surprise, I mean it seems to me that it was during the late 18 century early 19th century when the new machines were making possible the factory situation. It was not beyond the wit of man to see what was happening and project into the future and maybe forestall the really dreadful consequences which plagued England and most of western Europe and this country for sixty or seventy years, and the horrible abuses of the factory system and if a certain amount of forethought had been devoted to the problem at that time and if people had first of all found out what was happening and then used their imagination to see what might happen, and then had gone on to work out the means by which the worst applications of the techniques would not take place, well then I think western humanity might have been spared about three generations of utter misery which had been imposed on the poor at that time.

And the same way with various technological advances now, I mean we need to think about the problems with automation and more profoundly the problems, which may arise with these new techniques, which may contribute to this ultimate revolution. Our business is to be aware of what is happening, and then to use our imagination to see what might happen, how this might be abused, and then if possible to see that the enormous powers which we now possess thanks to these scientific and technological advances to be used for the benefit of human beings and not for their degradation.

Thank You

{Applause}